Barbara Snider
Senior Counsel
bsnider@beveragelaw.com
Tel: 415-362-1215 ext. 118
Fax: 415-362-1494
Barbara has broad experience as a regulatory, business and litigation attorney. She practiced at Cooper, White & Cooper LLP in San Francisco and as in-house Associate General Counsel for what is now known as Frontier Communications, a NYSE communications company, with responsibility for all legal affairs for six Western states. Barbara also successfully argued several California Appellate cases and testified before the California legislature on regulatory issues. Barbara now works with the partners at Hinman & Carmichael in all aspects of beverage law.
Barbara and her husband developed their first vineyard in Knights Valley, Calistoga and later, a high altitude mountain vineyard in the Red Hills Lake County. They produced award-winning wine under their Fortress Vineyards brand which they have now sold. Barbara handled all legal, regulatory, compliance and marketing matters for the vineyards and wine brand. Prior to becoming an attorney, Barbara taught Comparative Governments and International Politics at Golden Gate University in San Francisco.
ADMISSIONS
EDUCATION
University of California, Davis: B.A. and M.A. Comparative Governments and International Relations.
University of California, Hastings College of the Law: J.D.
COMMUNITY AND PROFESSIONAL INVOLVMENT
Memberships: The Edward J. McFetridge Inn of Court (San Francisco), Sonoma County Winegrowers , Lake County Winegrowers, Women for WineSense, Conference of California Public Utility Counsel.
Community Involvement: Chairperson, City of Larkspur Design Review Committee; President of St. Patrick’s School Board, President of Homeowners’ Associations.
BLOG POSTS
PUBLICATIONS
Wine Business Monthly
By Barbara Snider
July 2020
Quoted in Forbes (online) article, “The Americans With Disability Act of 1990 Poses Legal Challenge for Winery Websites Today,” May 10, 2019.
FDA Agents Increase Number of Surprise Inspections at Wineries
Wine Business Monthly
By Barbara Snider
December 2017
There is an on-going ADA regulations battle being waged against commercial websites; including those operated by wineries and other alcoholic beverage industry members. The regulations were passed with good intentions but need to be administered with a lighter touch than is happening right now.
Why do Proposition 65 notices matter? Every business – wherever located - that sells or ships a product with a chemical on the Proposition 65 list (over 1,000) to a California resident, must comply with the mandatory warnings .
On August 30th new regulations requiring warning signs about Proposition 65 dangers, cannabis exposure and BPA in packaging come into effect. It’s a trifecta of new compliance requirements, and it’s going to expose California alcohol and cannabis licensees to significant penalties for those that don’t pay attention.
The Proposition 65 warnings – not the warning you are used to!
By: Barbara Snider, Senior Counsel, and John Hinman, Senior Partner
Welcome to the insanely complicated world of alcohol regulation!
New legislative changes have now clarified that it’s a crime for almost all licensees to provide free transportation home from events and evenings out.
Unbeknown to most, California ABC law has consistently prohibited almost all alcoholic beverage licensees from providing free rides to customers because “free rides” are considered by the ABC an impermissible “thing of value,” and are considered by the anti-alcohol forces an inducement to consumption. While this prohibition has seldom (if ever) been enforced, it places responsible licensees who want to make sure that their customers are getting home safely in a very difficult spot – do they violate the law by providing a free ride home, or do they potentially endanger the community by allowing an inebriated customer to drive (or get) home on their own?
260 CALIFORNIA ST., STE 700, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, 94111
CONTACT@BEVERAGELAW.COM
TELEPHONE: (415) 362-1215/ FAX: (415) 362-1494
tOLL FREE: 1-800-877-8219
We are committed to rational regulation and, even though we occasionally criticize the regulators for overzealous enforcement of vague regulations, we nonetheless well understand that agency discretion is limited by the enabling regulations. Today we are encouraging the TTB to exercise their discretion (via the rule-making process) and authorize wine in a 250 ml can – the most popular size for single serve wine in use in the world today. Not a day goes by that doesn’t surface a success story about marketing wine in a can.