The Arsenic in Wine Class Action Dismissal – what it means

On March 23, 2016, the Superior Court for Los Angeles County entered an order dismissing Charles, et al. v. The Wine Group, et al., the last remaining class action lawsuit based upon the presence of minute quantities of arsenic in wine.  (For a discussion of arsenic in wine, see our earlier blog post A Layperson Looks At Arsenic in Wine).  Several other class actions in other states had earlier been dismissed voluntarily by the plaintiffs. 

The dismissal was at the pleading stage of the case, which means that there was no discovery and no trial.  The Court essentially said that even if everything the plaintiff’s claimed was true they didn’t have a case. That is what the appeal (already announced by the plaintiffs) is going to be all about. This case will be important to establishing the parameters of the safe harbor that compliance with Proposition 65 is supposed to provide to the wine industry.*

The Charles plaintiff’s claimed that the defendant wineries violated Proposition 65.  That is, of course, the law that gave rise to the proliferation of signs at every cash register at every store in the state stating: This product contains [or---This facility uses] chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm.  Plaintiffs claimed that Prop 65 required the defendant wineries to disclose specifically that their wines contain small quantities of arsenic.

Those claims were rejected because plaintiffs did not allege any physical injury resulting from arsenic. Further, the plaintiffs conceded that “the danger of arsenic varies with the level of concentration (as it does with every toxin) and that arsenic can be present in safe drinking water, so long as the concentration level is low.”  In other words, these lawyer-driven claims didn’t show that any real harm existed from the low levels of arsenic that exist in almost all wines.

The court then said that Proposition 65 doesn’t require disclosure of the specific chemicals that give rise to the duty to post the general warning.  This is important because there are over 800 compounds “known to the State of California” to be potential carcinogens or teratogens, and the list is available on-line.  Can you imagine what a label listing 800 chemical compounds would look like?

Turning to specifics, the Judge noted that the list “includes, for instance ‘Aloe Vera, non-decolorized whole leaf extract,” “Aspirin,” “Oral Contraceptives, sequential,” ‘Salted fish, Chinese-style,” “Unleaded gasoline (wholly vaporized),’ ‘and “Wood dust.’”  The point the Judge made was that California law requires only the general warning.  At that point the consumer is the one responsible or obtaining information about minute (and here the parts per billion is truly minute) specific compounds “from the party responsible for the exposure after the warning, rather than through the warning.” 

The Judge then made the obvious point that requiring disclosure of specific compounds would make the warnings “too congested and cumbersome to read and understand.”  That was an understated observation by the Judge.

Wine does not include the “known to the State of California” warning.  Instead, all bottles carry the warning prescribed by both federal and California law:

WARNING: Drinking Distilled Spirits, Beer, Coolers, Wine and Other Alcoholic Beverages May Increase Cancer Risk, and, During Pregnancy, Can Cause Birth Defects.

The Court then held that the warning given is “a designated safe harbor provision that specifically applies to ‘wine’” and is sufficient by itself.  This is important to every producer in the wine industry because it is a guide to lawful conduct. Everyone wants to know how they can be complaint. The Judge here answered that question: make sure that the Proposition 65 warning requirements are observed.

For those reasons the Judge dismissed the complaint and told the plaintiff’s that there was no way they could amend it to actually prove a case.  That order can be appealed (and the plaintiff’s said that they will appeal it), but, in our view, the dismissal should be affirmed. Keep in mind that an appeal that results in the Judge’s order being affirmed would not be a bad thing because then the decision would have a broader precedential effect. The message to the plaintiff’s here is be careful what you ask for.

The bottom line is that the decision both terminates a meritless claim and provides an important precedent for the industry.  There are undoubtedly traces of some of the 800-plus compounds on the “known to California” list, other than arsenic, in many products, including wine.  Putting the prescribed warning on the bottle protects producers from having to disclose specific compounds and from future frivolous lawsuits. So make sure your labels are compliant!

Finally, when you raise your next glass, please remember to toast the Superior Court and this Judge for a sound, well-reasoned rejection of what is hopefully the last lawsuit based upon the presence of minute quantities of arsenic (or anything else) in wine.  Salut!

 

*n.b. Hinman & Carmichael LLP represented defendants in the arsenic cases, and served as regulatory counsel to the joint defense committee

  1. Passage of Title Based Sales – Is it Right for You?
  2. BARS AND NIGHTCLUBS BEWARE! THE DRUG TESTING REGIME STARTS ON JULY 1ST AND YOU MUST BE READY!
  3. Strategic Exit Planning: Positioning Your Alcohol Beverage Business for Successful Acquisition or Investment
  4. New California Alcohol Laws for 2024 – a Mixed Bag of Privileges, Punishments, Clarifications, and Politics
  5. TTB Speaks up on Social Media
  6. Alcohol Trade Practices Update
  7. President Biden just made a big cannabis announcement... what does it mean?
  8. The Uniform Law Commission – Encouraging Consistent State by State Definitions, Protocols and Procedures
  9. San Francisco to the Governor - Review the RBS Program and Delay Implementation. Problems must be Corrected.
  10. TTB and Consignment Sales – Is There a Disconnect Between Policy Development and Business Reality?
  11. RBS ADDENDUM – THE LATEST FROM THE ABC AS THE AGENCY PROVIDES MORE INFORMATION ON THE CALIFORNIA ABC’S MANDATORY RESPONSIBLE BEVERAGE SERVER PROGRAM
  12. THE STATE OF TO-GO BOOZE IN CALIFORNIA
  13. BOOZE RULES SPECIAL EDITION – THE RESPONSIBLE BEVERAGE SERVICE PROGRAM FACTS AND REQUIREMENTS
  14. Competition in the Beverage Alcohol Industry Continues Under the Microscope – Part 3
  15. Competition in the Beverage Alcohol Industry Under the Microscope – Part 2
  16. Competition in the Beverage Alcohol Industry Now Under the Microscope
  17. Alcohol Marketplaces 2.0 Part 5: Looking Ahead
  18. It’s Time for a Regulatory Check-Up: Privacy Policies for email marketing and websites
  19. Alcohol Marketplaces 2.0 Part 4: Who’s responsible for ensuring legal drinking age?
  20. Alcohol Marketplaces 2.0 Part 3: Follow the Money
  21. BOOZE RULES 2021 – NEW CONTAINER SIZES APPROVED FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES: KEEPING TRACK OF THE TTB’S ATTEMPTS TO REGULATE CONTANER SIZES
  22. Alcohol Marketplaces 2.0 Part 2: Collect sales tax from marketplaces or comply with alcohol guidance?
  23. Alcohol Marketplaces 2.0 Part 1: Solicitation of sales by unlicensed third-party providers
  24. Federal Cannabis Legalization Fortune-Telling
  25. BOOZE RULES – THE DIRECT SHIPPING WARS
  26. California ABC provides additional Covid guidance on virtual events and charitable promotions
  27. Hot Topics for Alcohol Delivery 2020
  28. California Reopening Roadmap is Now a Blueprint for a Safer Economy
  29. The Hospitality Reopening Roadmap to Success
  30. Salads Not A Meal in California, Says ABC
  31. Delivery Personnel Beware – The ABC is Coming for You and for the Licensees Hiring You to Deliver Alcoholic Beverages - This Time Its Justified
  32. Licensees Beware – the Harsh New ABC Enforcement Rules Are Effective Right Now
  33. Part 2: LEGAL FAQS ON REOPENING CA RESTAURANTS, BREWPUBS, BARS AND TASTING ROOMS
  34. John Hinman’s May 22, 2020 interview with Wine Industry Advisor on the ABC COVID-19 Regulatory Relief initiatives and the ABC “emergency rule” proposals
  35. Booze Rules May 21 - The Latest on the ABC Emergency Rules
  36. Part 1: Legal FAQs on Reopening CA Restaurants, Brewpubs, Bars and Tasting Rooms
  37. The ABC’s Fourth Round of Regulatory Relief - Expanded License Footprints Through Temporary COVID-19 Catering Authorizations, and Expanded Privileges for Club Licensees
  38. BOOZE RULES – May 17, 2020 Special Edition
  39. ABC ENFORCEMENT - ALIVE, ACTIVE AND OUT IN THE COMMUNITY
  40. Frequently Asked Questions about ABC’s Guidance on Virtual Wine Tastings
  41. ABC Keeps California Hospitality Industry Essential
  42. ABC REGULATORY RELIEF – ROUND TWO – WHAT IT MEANS
  43. Essential Businesses Corona Virus Signage Requirement Every Essential Business in San Francisco Must Post Sign by Friday, April 3rd
  44. Promotions Compliance: Balancing Risk and Reward
  45. The March 25, 2020 ABC Guidance: Enforcement Continues; Charitable Giving Remains Subject to ABC Rules; and More – What Does it all Mean?
  46. Restaurant and Bar Best Practices – Surviving Covid 19, Stay at Home and Shelter in Place Under the New ABC Waivers
  47. Economically Surviving the Covid Crisis and the Shelter in Place Orders: A Primer on Regulatory interpretations and Options
  48. Booze Rules – Hinman & Carmichael LLP and the Corona Virus
  49. Booze Rules: 2020 and the Decade to Come – Great Expectations (with apologies to Charles Dickens)
  50. The RBS Chronicles: If Your Business serves Alcoholic Beverages YOU NEED TO READ THIS AND TAKE ACTION!
  51. RESPONSIBLE BEVERAGE SERVICE ACT HEARING – OCTOBER 11TH IN SACRAMENTO – BE THERE!
  52. WHEN THE INVESTIGATOR COMES CALLING – BEST PRACTICES.
  53. RESPONSIBLE BEVERAGE SERVICE ACT PROPOSED ABC RULES 160 TO 173 – WHY THE RUSH?
  54. The TTB Crusade Against Small Producers and the “Consignment Sale” Business Model
  55. TTB Protocols, Procedures, and Investigations
  56. Wine in a 250 ML can – the Mystery of the TTB packaging Regulations and Solving the Problem by Amending the Regulations
  57. The Passing of John Manfreda of the TTB: a Tragedy for his family and a Tragedy for the Industry he so Faithfully Served for so Long.
  58. Pride in a Job Well-done, or Blood Money? The Cost of Learning the Truth from the TTB about the Benefits to Investigators from Making Cases Against Industry Members
  59. How ADA Website Compliance Works – The Steps You Can Take to Protect Yourself, Your Website and Your Social Media from Liability
  60. Supplier and Distributor Promotional “Banks,” Third Party Promotion Companies and Inconsistent TTB Enforcement, Oh My!
  61. “A Wrong Without a Remedy – Not in My America” – The TTB Death Penalty for Not Reporting Deaths
  62. Is a 1935 Alcohol Beverage Federal Trade Practice Law Stifling Innovation?
  63. Decoding the BCC’s Guidance on Commercial Cannabis Activity.
  64. Prop 65 - Escaping a "Notice of Violation"
  65. TTB Consignment Sales Investigations - What is Behind the Curtain of the TTB Press Releases?
  66. Heads Up! The ABC Is Stepping Up Enforcement Against Licensees Located Near Universities
  67. Coming Soon: New Mandatory Training Requirements for over One Million “Alcohol Servers” In California – September 1, 2021 will be here quickly
  68. 2019 Legislative Changes for California Alcohol Producers – a Blessing or a Curse?
  69. A Picture (On Instagram) Is Worth A Thousand Words
  70. Playing by the Rules: California Cannabis Final Regulations Takeaways
  71. Hinman & Carmichael LLP Names Erin Kelleher Partner and Welcomes Gillian Garrett and Tsion “Sunshine” Lencho to the Firm
  72. Congress Makes History and Changes the CBD Game for Good
  73. Pernicious Practices (stuff we see that will get folks in trouble!) Today’s Rant – Bill & Hold
  74. CBD: An Exciting New Fall Schedule… or Not?
  75. MISSISSIPPI RISING - A VICTORY FOR LEGAL RETAILER TO CONSUMER SALES, AND PASSAGE OF TITLE UNDER THE UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE
  76. California ABC's Cannabis Advisory - Not Just for Stoners
  77. NEW CALIFORNIA WARNINGS FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND CANNABIS PRODUCTS TAKE EFFECT AUGUST 30, 2018, NOW INCLUDING ADDENDUM REGARDING 2014 CONSENT AGREEMENT PARTIES AND PARTICIPANTS
  78. National Conference of State Liquor Administrators – The Alcohol Industry gathers in Hawaii to figure out how to enforce the US “Highly Archaic Regulatory Scheme.”
  79. Founder John Hinman Honored with the Raphael House Community Impact Award
  80. ROUTE TO MARKET AND MARKETING RESTRICTIONS - NAVIGATING REGULATORY SYSTEM CONSTRAINTS
  81. Alcohol and Cannabis Ventures: Top 5 Legal Considerations
  82. ATF and TTB: Is Another Divorce on the Horizon? What’s Going on with the Agency?
  83. STRIKE 3 - YOU REALLY ARE OUT! THE ABC'S STRICT APPLICATION OF PENALTIES FOR SALES TO MINORS
  84. TTB Temporarily Fixes Problem with Fulfillment Warehouse Tax Credits - an “Alternate Procedure” for Paying Taxes & Reporting
  85. CUSTOMERS WHO HAVE HAD ONE TOO MANY - THE FREE TRANSPORTATION DILEMMA
  86. The Renaissance of Federal Unfair Trade Practices - Current Issues and Strategies
  87. ‘Twas the week before New Year’s and the ABC is out in Force – Alerts for the Last Week of 2017, including the Limits on Free Rides
  88. Big Bottles, Caviar and a CA Wine Strong Silent Auction for the Holidays!
  89. The FDA and the Wine and Spirits Industry – Surprise inspections anyone?
  90. NORTHERN CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES: UPDATED REGULATORY AGENCY DISASTER RELIEF RESOURCES AT A GLANCE
  91. NORTHERN CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES: REGULATORY AGENCY DISASTER RELIEF RESOURCES AT A GLANCE
  92. Soon to come to your Local Supermarket– Instant Redeemable Coupons of the digital age!
  93. The License Piggyback Dilemma – If it Sounds Too Good to be True, it Probably is
  94. A timely message from our Florida colleagues on the tied house laws, the three-tier system and the need for reform
  95. ABC Declaratory Rulings – A Modest Proposal Whose Time has Come
  96. More on FDA Inspections - Breweries, Distilleries and Questions
  97. WHY THE FDA IS INSPECTING WINERIES
  98. Senate Bill 378—The Proposed Demise of Due Process for Alcohol Licensees
  99. ABC Enforcement - Trends and Predictions
  100. The Corruption Chronicles – Volume One: A New Hope